Trigonometry Angles
The angles
(with
integers) for which the trigonometric
functions may be expressed in terms of finite root
extraction of real numbers are limited to values of
which are precisely
those which produce constructible polygons.
Analytic expressions for trigonometric functions with arguments of this form can
be obtained using the Wolfram Language
function ToRadicals,
e.g., ToRadicals[Sin[Pi/17]],
for values of
(for
, the trigonometric
functions auto-evaluate in the Wolfram
Language).
Compass and straightedge constructions dating back to Euclid were capable of inscribing regular
polygons of 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 64, ..., sides. However,
Gauss showed in 1796 (when he was 19 years old) that a sufficient
condition for a regular polygon on
sides to be constructible
was that
be of the form
|
(1)
|
where
is a nonnegative
integer and the
are distinct Fermat
primes. Here, a Fermat prime is a prime Fermat number,
i.e., a prime number of the form
|
(2)
|
where
is an integer,
and the only known primes of this form are 3, 5,
17, 257, and 65537. The first proof of the fact that this condition was also necessary
is credited to Wantzel (1836).
A necessary and sufficient condition that a regular
-gon be constructible
is that
be a power
of 2, where
is the totient
function (Kríek et al. 2001, p. 34).
Constructible values of
for
were given
by Gauss (Smith 1994), and the first few are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16,
17, 20, 24, 30, 32, 34, 40, 48, 51, 60, 64, 68, 80, 85, 96, 102, 120, 128, 136, 160,
170, 192, ... (OEIS A003401).
The algebraic degrees of
for constructible
polygons are 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 8, 4, 4, 4, 8, ...(OEIS A113401),
and of
are ... (OEIS A113402).
Gardner (1977) and independently Watkins (Conway and Guy 1996, Kríek et al. 2001) noticed that the number of sides for constructible polygons with odd numbers of sides are given by the first 32 rows of the Sierpiński sieve interpreted as binary numbers, giving 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 51, 85, 255, ... (OEIS A004729, Conway and Guy 1996, p. 140). In other words, every row is a product of distinct Fermat primes, with terms given by binary counting.
A partial table of the analytic values of sine, cosine, and tangent for arguments
with small
integer
is given below. Derivations of these
formulas appear in the following entries.
| 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 15.0 | ||||
| 18.0 | ||||
| 22.5 | ||||
| 30.0 | ||||
| 36.0 | ||||
| 45.0 | 1 | |||
| 60.0 | ||||
| 90.0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 180.0 | 0 | 0 |
There is a nice mnemonic for remembering sines of common angles,
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
| |||
|
(6)
| |||
|
(7)
|
In general, any trigonometric function can be expressed in radicals for arguments of the form
, where
is a rational
number, by writing the trigonometric functions in exponential form and the exponentials
as roots of
. For example,
|
(8)
|
This confirms that for
rational, trigonometric
functions of
are always algebraic
numbers. For example, the cases
and
involve the
cubic equation (in
and
, respectively). The polynomial
of which a given expression is a root can be obtained in the Wolfram
Language using the syntax RootReduce[ToRadicals[expr]],
which produces a Root
object.
Letting
denoted the
th root of the polynomial
in the ordering of the Wolfram
Language's Root
object, the first few analytic values of
are summarized
in the following table.
| 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 |
The algebraic order of
is given
analytically by
![]() |
(9)
|
where
is the totient
function. For
, 2, ..., this gives the sequence 1,
1, 2, 2, 4, 1, 6, 4, 6, 2, 10, 4, ... (OEIS A055035).
The minimal polynomial for
with
an odd prime
is given by
|
(10)
|
(Beslin and de Angelis 2004).
If
and
, the algebraic
order of
is given by
![]() |
(11)
|
(Ribenboim 1972, p. 289; Beslin and de Angelis 2004). This gives the sequence 1, 1, 2, 1, 4, 2, 6, 2, 6, 4, 10, 1, ... (OEIS A093819).
The first few analytic values of
are summarized
in the following table.
| 1 | |
| 2 | 0 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 |
The algebraic order of
is given
analytically by
![]() |
(12)
|
where
is the totient
function. For
, 2, ..., this gives the sequence 1,
1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 5, 4, 6, ... (OEIS A055034;
Lehmer 1933, Watkins and Zeitlin 1993, Surowski and McCombs 2003).
The algebraic order of
is given
analytically by
|
(13)
|
(Ribenboim 1972, p. 289; Beslin and de Angelis 2004) giving the sequence 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 5, ... (OEIS A023022).
For
with
an odd
prime, an explicit formula can be given for the minimal polynomial, namely
|
(14)
|
where
|
(15)
| |||
|
(16)
| |||
|
(17)
|
(Surowski and McCombs 2003; correcting the sign in the definition of
). Watkins
and Zeitlin (1993) showed that
|
(18)
|
for
odd, where
is a Chebyshev
polynomial of the first kind, and
|
(19)
|
for
even.
Beslin and de Angelis (2004) give the simpler form
|
(20)
|
where
is as defined above.
As already noted, a special type of expansion in terms of radicals with real arguments can be obtained if
is a power of two
times a product of distinct Fermat primes. For other values of
, the situation
becomes more complicated. It is now no longer possible to express trigonometric functions
in a form that they are expressed as real radicals, but a certain minimal representation
still exists. The simplest nontrivial example is for
. The exact meaning
of "minimal" is rather technical and is related to the Galois
subgroups of certain cyclotomic polynomials
(Weber 1996). As it turns out, for
prime, the expansions
are especially interesting and difficult, and higher order Galois
group calculations are both difficult and time-consuming. For example,
is a very difficult
case and takes a long time to calculate. Some larger primes are easier again but
the complexity grows with the size of the prime on average.
While individual trigonometric functions may require complicated representations at certain angles, there are general formulas for the products of these functions. For example,
![]() |
(21)
| ||
|
(22)
| |||
![]() |
(23)
| ||
|
(24)
|
The first few values of the latter for
, 2, ... are
therefore 1, 1, 3/4, 1/2, 5/16, 3/16, ... (OEIS A000265
and A084623). Another example is the general
case of Morrie's law,
|
(25)
|





are (1,i), (i,-1) linearly independent?

