A Dirichlet -series
is a series of the form
(1)
|
where the number theoretic character is an integer
function with period
, are called Dirichlet
-series. These series are very important in additive
number theory (they were used, for instance, to prove Dirichlet's
theorem), and have a close connection with modular
forms. Dirichlet
-series
can be written as sums of Lerch transcendents
with
a power of
.
Dirichlet -series
is implemented in the Wolfram Language
as DirichletL[k,
j, s] for the Dirichlet character
with modulus
and index
.
The generalized Riemann hypothesis conjectures that neither the Riemann zeta function
nor any Dirichlet -series
has a zero with real part larger than 1/2.
(2)
| |||
(3)
|
(4)
| |||
(5)
|
(6)
| |||
(7)
|
are all Dirichlet -series
(Borwein and Borwein 1987, p. 289).
Hecke (1936) found a remarkable connection between each modular form with Fourier series
(8)
|
and the Dirichlet -series
(9)
|
This Dirichlet series converges absolutely for
(if
is a cusp form) and
if
is not a cusp form. In particular,
if the coefficients
satisfy the multiplicative property
(10)
|
then the Dirichlet -series
will have a representation of the form
(11)
|
which is absolutely convergent with the Dirichlet series (Apostol 1997, pp. 136-137). In addition, let be an even integer, then
can be analytically continued beyond the
line
such that
1. If ,
then
is an entire function of
,
2. If ,
is analytic for all
except a single simple pole at
with complex residue
(12)
|
where
is the gamma function, and
3.
satisfies
(13)
|
(Apostol 1997, p. 137).
The number theoretic character is called primitive if the j-conductor
. Otherwise,
is imprimitive. A primitive
-series modulo
is then defined as one for which
is primitive. All imprimitive
-series can be expressed in terms of primitive
-series.
Let
or
,
where
are distinct odd primes. Then there are three possible
types of primitive
-series
with real coefficients.
The requirement of real coefficients
restricts the number theoretic character
to
for all
and
.
The three type are then
1. If
(e.g.,
,
3, 5, ...) or
(e.g.,
,
12, 20, ...), there is exactly one primitive
-series.
2. If
(e.g.,
,
24, ...), there are two primitive
-series.
3. If ,
or
where
(e.g.,
,
6, 9, ...), there are no primitive
-series
(Zucker and Robertson 1976). All primitive -series are algebraically
independent and divide into two types according to
(14)
|
Primitive -series
of these types are denoted
. For a primitive
-series with real number
theoretic character, if
, then
(15)
|
If ,
then
(16)
|
and if ,
then there is a primitive function of each type (Zucker and Robertson 1976).
The first few primitive negative -series are
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ... (OEIS A003657),
corresponding to the negated discriminants of imaginary
quadratic fields. The first few primitive positive
-series are
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ... (OEIS A003658).
The Kronecker symbol is a real number
theoretic character modulo
, and is in fact essentially the only type of real primitive
number theoretic character mod
(Ayoub 1963). Therefore,
(17)
|
where
is the Kronecker symbol (Borwein and Borwein
1987, p. 293).
For primitive values of , the Kronecker symbols are periodic with period
, so
can be written in the form of
sums, each of which can be expressed in terms of the polygamma function
, giving
(18)
|
The functional equations for are
(19)
| |||
(20)
|
(Borwein and Borwein 1986, p. 303).
For
a positive integer
(21)
| |||
(22)
| |||
(23)
| |||
(24)
| |||
(25)
| |||
(26)
|
where
and
are rational numbers. Nothing general appears
to be known about
or
,
although it is possible to express all
in terms of known transcendentals (Zucker and Robertson
1976).
can be expressed in terms of transcendentals by
(27)
|
where
is the class number and
is the Dirichlet
structure constant.
No general forms are known for and
in terms of known transcendentals. Edwards (2000)
gives several examples of special cases of
. A number of primitive series
are given by
(28)
| |||
(29)
| |||
(30)
| |||
(31)
| |||
(32)
| |||
(33)
| |||
(34)
| |||
(35)
| |||
(36)
| |||
(37)
| |||
(38)
| |||
(39)
| |||
(40)
| |||
(41)
|
and for
are given by
(42)
| |||
(43)
| |||
(44)
| |||
(45)
| |||
(46)
| |||
(47)
| |||
(48)
| |||
(49)
| |||
(50)
| |||
(51)
| |||
(52)
|
where
is Catalan's constant,
is the trigamma function,
and
is the dilogarithm.
Bailey and Borwein (Bailey and Borwein 2005; Bailey et al. 2006a, pp. 5 and 62; Bailey et al. 2006b; Bailey and Borwein 2008; Coffey 2008) conjectured
the relation actually in effect proved by Zagier (1986) nearly twenty years earlier
(M. Coffey, pers. comm., Mar. 30, 2009) that is also given by
(53)
| |||
(54)
| |||
(55)
| |||
(56)
| |||
(57)
|
where the latter expressions are due to Coffey (2008ab), with
(58)
| |||
(59)
| |||
(60)
| |||
(61)
| |||
(62)
|