TOPICS
Search

Complex Residue


The complex residue of a function f at an isolated singularity z_0 is the coefficient a_(-1) in the Laurent series

 f(z)=sum_(n=-infty)^inftya_n(z-z_0)^n
(1)

of f(z) about z_0. If f is analytic at z_0, its residue is zero, but the converse is not always true (for example, 1/z^2 has residue of 0 at z=0 but is not analytic at z=0). The residue of a function f at a point z_0 may be denoted Res_(z=z_0)(f(z)). The residue is implemented in the Wolfram Language as Residue[f, {z, z0}].

Two basic examples of residues are given by Res_(z=0)1/z=1 and Res_(z=0)1/z^n=0 for an integer n>1.

The definition applies to an isolated singularity that is an essential singularity as well as a pole. For example,

Res_(z=0)e^(-1/z)=-1
(2)
Res_(z=0)z^3e^(1/z)=1/(24)
(3)
Res_(z=0)e^(e^(1/z))=e
(4)
Res_(z=0)e^(e^(e^(1/z)))=e^(e+1).
(5)

The last two residues are the coefficients of t in the Taylor series of e^(e^t) and e^(e^(e^t)), respectively. A branch point does not have an ordinary residue because the chosen branch is not a single-valued function that is analytic throughout a deleted neighborhood of that point.

Residues at higher-order poles also occur in products of special functions. For example, Gamma(z)Gamma(z+3) has a pole of order 2 at z=-5, with

 Res_(z=-5)Gamma(z)Gamma(z+3)=gamma/(120)-(227)/(14400),
(6)

where Gamma(z) is the gamma function and gamma is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Residue

The residue of a function f around a point z_0 is also defined by

 Res_(z_0)f=1/(2pii)∮_gammafdz,
(7)

where gamma is a counterclockwise simple closed contour enclosing z_0 and no other singularity, and f is holomorphic on and inside the contour except at z_0. More generally, the same result holds for a closed contour with contour winding number 1 about z_0 and 0 about every other singularity, under the hypotheses of the residue theorem. The above diagram shows a suitable contour for which to define the residue of a function, where the poles are indicated as black dots.

It is more natural to consider the residue of a meromorphic one-form because it is independent of the choice of coordinate chart. On a Riemann surface, the residue is defined for a meromorphic one-form alpha at a point p by writing alpha=fdz in a coordinate chart z around p. Then

 Res_(p)alpha=Res_(z=z(p))f.
(8)

The residue at infinity is obtained by transforming the one-form f(z)dz under z=1/w. The sum of the residues of a meromorphic one-form fdz is zero on the Riemann sphere. More generally, the sum of the residues of a meromorphic one-form on a compact Riemann surface must be zero.

The residues of a function f(z) may be found without explicitly expanding into a Laurent series as follows. If f(z) has a pole of order m at z_0, then a_n=0 for n<-m and a_(-m)!=0. Therefore,

f(z)=sum_(n=-m)^(infty)a_n(z-z_0)^n
(9)
=sum_(n=0)^(infty)a_(-m+n)(z-z_0)^(-m+n).
(10)

Multiplying both sides by (z-z_0)^m gives

 (z-z_0)^mf(z)=sum_(n=0)^inftya_(-m+n)(z-z_0)^n.
(11)

Take the first derivative and reindex,

d/(dz)[(z-z_0)^mf(z)]=sum_(n=0)^(infty)na_(-m+n)(z-z_0)^(n-1)
(12)
=sum_(n=1)^(infty)na_(-m+n)(z-z_0)^(n-1)
(13)
=sum_(n=0)^(infty)(n+1)a_(-m+n+1)(z-z_0)^n.
(14)

Take the second derivative and reindex,

(d^2)/(dz^2)[(z-z_0)^mf(z)]=sum_(n=0)^(infty)n(n+1)a_(-m+n+1)(z-z_0)^(n-1)
(15)
=sum_(n=1)^(infty)n(n+1)a_(-m+n+1)(z-z_0)^(n-1)
(16)
=sum_(n=0)^(infty)(n+1)(n+2)a_(-m+n+2)(z-z_0)^n.
(17)

Iterating then gives

(d^(m-1))/(dz^(m-1))[(z-z_0)^mf(z)]=sum_(n=0)^(infty)(n+1)(n+2)...(n+m-1)a_(n-1)(z-z_0)^n
(18)
=(m-1)!a_(-1)+sum_(n=1)^(infty)(n+1)(n+2)...(n+m-1)a_(n-1)(z-z_0)^n.
(19)

So

lim_(z->z_0)(d^(m-1))/(dz^(m-1))[(z-z_0)^mf(z)]=lim_(z->z_0)(m-1)!a_(-1)+0
(20)
=(m-1)!a_(-1)
(21)

since lim_(z->z_0)(z-z_0)^n=0, and the residue is

 a_(-1)=1/((m-1)!)(d^(m-1))/(dz^(m-1))[(z-z_0)^mf(z)]_(z=z_0).
(22)

For a pole of order n at a, write F(z)=(z-a)^nf(z), so F is analytic near a and F(a)!=0. Its logarithmic derivative Phi(z)=F^'(z)/F(z) provides an alternative formula,

 Res_(z=a)f(z)=(F(a))/((n-1)!)Y_(n-1)(Phi(a),Phi^'(a),...,Phi^((n-2))(a)),
(23)

where Y_(n-1) is the complete Bell polynomial. For n=1, the argument list is empty and Y_0=1. For example, for n=3 the formula is

 Res_(z=a)f(z)=(F(a))/2[Phi(a)^2+Phi^'(a)].
(24)

Formulas of this type reduce higher-order residue calculations to derivatives of Phi (Liu 2001, p. 134).

The residues of a meromorphic function at its poles characterize a great deal of the structure of a function, appearing for example in the amazing residue theorem of contour integration.


See also

Branch Point, Cauchy Integral Formula, Cauchy Integral Theorem, Contour Integration, Contour Winding Number, Essential Singularity, Isolated Singularity, Laurent Series, Logarithmic Derivative, Pole, Residue at Infinity, Residue Theorem

Portions of this entry contributed by Todd Rowland

Explore with Wolfram|Alpha

References

Gautam, S. "Complex Analysis: Lecture 26." Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 2020. https://people.math.osu.edu/gautam.42/S20/LectureNotes/Lecture26.pdf.Li, T.-T. (Ed.). Problems and Solutions in Mathematics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1142/3798.Liu, Z.-G. "Residue Theorem and Theta Function Identities." Ramanujan J. 5, 129-151, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011427622187.Mitrinović, D. S. and Kečkić, J. D. The Cauchy Method of Residues: Theory and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6872-2.Mitrinović, D. S. and Kečkić, J. D. The Cauchy Method of Residues, Vol. 2: Theory and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2000-5.Trott, M. "Residues" and "Logarithmic Residue." §1.6.5 and exercise and solution 41(c) in The Mathematica GuideBook for Symbolics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28815-5. https://www.mathematicaguidebooks.org/.

Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha

Complex Residue

Cite this as:

Weisstein, Eric W., with contributions by Todd Rowland. "Complex Residue." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexResidue.html

Subject classifications