The complex residue of a function at an isolated singularity
is the coefficient
in the Laurent
series
|
(1)
|
of
about
.
If
is analytic at
, its residue is zero, but the converse
is not always true (for example,
has residue of 0 at
but is not analytic
at
).
The residue of a function
at a point
may be denoted
. The residue is implemented in the Wolfram
Language as Residue[f,
z, z0
].
Two basic examples of residues are given by and
for an integer
.
The definition applies to an isolated singularity that is an essential singularity as well as a pole. For example,
|
(2)
| |||
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
|
The last two residues are the coefficients of in the Taylor
series of
and
,
respectively. A branch point does not have an ordinary
residue because the chosen branch is not a single-valued
function that is analytic throughout a deleted neighborhood of that point.
Residues at higher-order poles also occur in products of special functions. For example, has a pole of order
2 at
,
with
|
(6)
|
where
is the gamma function and
is the Euler-Mascheroni
constant.
The residue of a function around a point
is also defined by
|
(7)
|
where
is a counterclockwise simple closed contour enclosing
and no other singularity,
and
is holomorphic on and inside the contour
except at
.
More generally, the same result holds for a closed contour
with contour winding number 1 about
and 0 about every other singularity,
under the hypotheses of the residue theorem. The
above diagram shows a suitable contour for which to define
the residue of a function, where the poles
are indicated as black dots.
It is more natural to consider the residue of a meromorphic one-form because it is independent of the choice of coordinate
chart. On a Riemann surface, the residue is
defined for a meromorphic one-form at a point
by writing
in a coordinate chart
around
. Then
|
(8)
|
The residue at infinity is obtained by transforming the one-form under
. The sum of the residues of a
meromorphic one-form
is zero on the Riemann
sphere. More generally, the sum of the residues of a
meromorphic one-form on a compact Riemann surface must be zero.
The residues of a function may be found without explicitly expanding into a Laurent
series as follows. If
has a pole of order
at
, then
for
and
. Therefore,
|
(9)
| |||
|
(10)
|
Multiplying both sides by gives
|
(11)
|
Take the first derivative and reindex,
|
(12)
| |||
|
(13)
| |||
|
(14)
|
Take the second derivative and reindex,
|
(15)
| |||
|
(16)
| |||
|
(17)
|
Iterating then gives
|
(18)
| |||
|
(19)
|
So
|
(20)
| |||
|
(21)
|
since ,
and the residue is
|
(22)
|
For a pole of order at
, write
, so
is analytic near
and
. Its logarithmic
derivative
provides an alternative formula,
|
(23)
|
where
is the complete Bell polynomial. For
, the argument list is empty and
. For example, for
the formula is
|
(24)
|
Formulas of this type reduce higher-order residue calculations to derivatives of
(Liu 2001, p. 134).
The residues of a meromorphic function at its poles characterize a great deal of the structure of a function, appearing for example in the amazing residue theorem of contour integration.