![]() |
The sinc function ,
also called the "sampling function," is a function that arises frequently
in signal processing and the theory of Fourier transforms.
The full name of the function is "sine cardinal," but it is commonly referred
to by its abbreviation, "sinc." There are two definitions in common use.
The one adopted in this work defines
(1)
|
where
is the sine function, plotted above.
This has the normalization
(2)
|
This function is implemented in the Wolfram Language as Sinc[x].
![]() |
When extended into the complex plane, is illustrated above.
An interesting property of is that the set of local
extrema of
corresponds to its intersections with the cosine function
, as illustrated above.
The derivative is given by
(3)
|
and the indefinite integral by
(4)
|
where
is the sine integral.
Woodward (1953), McNamee et al. (1971), and Bracewell (1999, p. 62) adopt the alternative definition
(5)
| |||
(6)
|
The latter definition is sometimes more convenient as a result of its simple normalization,
(7)
|
That variant also satisfies the sum
(8)
|
In addition, the binomial coefficient satisfies
(9)
|
which is essentially a restatement of the reflection relation
(10)
|
of the gamma function (M. Somos, pers. comm., Oct. 26, 2006.)
The sinc function is closely related to the spherical Bessel function of the first kind and, in particular,
(11)
|
and is given in terms of the Meijer G-function as
(12)
|
Let
be the rectangle function, then the Fourier
transform of
is the sinc function
(13)
|
The sinc function therefore frequently arises in physical applications such as Fourier transform spectroscopy as the so-called instrument function, which gives the instrumental response to a delta function input. Removing the instrument functions from the final spectrum requires use of some sort of deconvolution algorithm.
The sinc function can be written as a complex integral by noting that, for ,
(14)
| |||
(15)
| |||
(16)
| |||
(17)
|
and that
and the integral both equal 1 for
.
The sinc function can also be written as the infinite product
(18)
|
a result discovered in 1593 by Francois Viète (Kac 1959, Morrison 1995) and sometimes known as Euler's formula (Prudnikov et al. 1986, p. 757; Gearhart and Shulz 1990). It is also given by
(19)
|
(Gearhart and Shulz 1990) and
(20)
|
(Prudnikov et al. 1986, p. 757).
Another product is given by
(21)
| |||
(22)
|
(OEIS A118253; Prudnikov et al. 1986, p. 757), where
is the constant from polygon circumscribing.
Sums of powers of
over the positive integers include
(23)
| |||
(24)
| |||
(25)
| |||
(26)
| |||
(27)
| |||
(28)
|
The remarkable fact that the sums of and
are equal appears to have first been published in
Baillie (1978). Amazingly, the pattern of these sums being equal to
plus a rational multiple of
breaks down for the power
, where the sum equals
(29)
|
where
(30)
|
The sinc function satisfies the identity
(31)
|
Definite integrals involving the sinc function include
(32)
| |||
(33)
| |||
(34)
| |||
(35)
| |||
(36)
|
After dividing out the constant factor of , the values are again 1/2, 1/2, 3/8, 1/3, 115/384, 11/40,
5887/23040, 151/630, 259723/1146880, ... (OEIS A049330
and A049331; Grimsey 1945, Medhurst and Roberts
1965). These are all special cases of the amazing general result
(37)
|
where
and
are positive integers such that
,
,
is the floor function,
and
is taken to be equal to 1 (Kogan; cf. Espinosa and Moll 2000). This spectacular formula
simplifies in the special case when
is a positive even
integer to
(38)
|
where
is an Eulerian number (Kogan; cf. Espinosa and
Moll 2000). The solution of the integral can also be written in terms of the recurrence
relation for the coefficients
(39)
|
The half-infinite integral of can be derived using contour
integration. In the above figure, consider the path
. Now write
. On an arc,
and on the x-axis,
. Write
(40)
|
where
denotes the imaginary part. Now define
(41)
| |||
(42)
|
where the second and fourth terms use the identities and
. Simplifying,
(43)
| |||
(44)
|
where the third term vanishes by Jordan's lemma. Performing the integration of the first term and combining the others yield
(45)
|
Rearranging gives
(46)
|
so
(47)
|
The same result is arrived at using the method of complex residues by noting
(48)
| |||
(49)
| |||
(50)
| |||
(51)
|
so
(52)
|
Since the integrand is symmetric, we therefore have
(53)
|
giving the sine integral evaluated at 0 as
(54)
|