 
By analogy with the sinc function, define the tanc function by
| 
(1)
 | 
Since 
 is not a cardinal function, the "analogy"
 with the sinc function is one of functional structure,
 not mathematical properties. It is quite possible that a better term than 
, as introduced here, could be coined, although there
 appears to be no name previously assigned to this function.
The derivative is given by
| 
(2)
 | 
The indefinite integral can apparently not be done in closed form in terms of conventionally defined functions.
This function commonly arises in problems in physics, where it is desired to determine values of 
 for which 
,
 i.e., 
.
 This is a transcendental equation whose first few solutions are given in the following
 table and illustrated above.
| OEIS | root | |
| 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | A115365 | 4.4934094579090641753... | 
| 2 | 7.7252518369377071642... | |
| 3 | 10.904121659428899827... | |
| 4 | 14.066193912831473480... | |
| 5 | 17.220755271930768739... | 
The first of these solutions can be given in closed form as
| 
(3)
 | 
where 
 is the 
th
 positive root of the Bessel function
 of the first kind 
.
The positive solutions can be written explicitly in series form as
| 
(4)
 | 
(OEIS A079330 and A088989), where the series in 
 can be found by series reversion of the series
 for 
 and
| 
(5)
 | 
for 
 a positive integer (D. W. Cantrell,
 pers. comm., Jan. 3, 2003). In practice, the first three terms of the series
 often suffice for obtaining approximate solutions.
Because of the vertical asymptotes of  as odd multiples of 
, this function is much less well-behaved than the sinc
 function, even as 
.
 The plot above shows 
 for integers 
.
 The values of 
 giving incrementally smallest values of 
 are 
, 11, 1317811389848379909481978463177998812826691414678853402757616,
 ...(OEIS A079331), corresponding to values
 of 
, 
, 
, 
, .... Similarly, the values of 
 giving incrementally largest values of 
 are 
, 122925461, 534483448, 3083975227, 214112296674652, ...
 (OEIS A079332), corresponding to 1.55741, 2.65934,
 3.58205, 4.3311, 18.0078, 18.0566, 556.306, ... (D. W. Cantrell, pers.
 comm., Jan. 3, 2002). The following table (P. Carmody, pers. comm., Nov. 21,
 2003) extends these results up through the 194,000 term of the continued fraction.
 All these extrema correspond to numerators of the continued fraction expansion of
 
. In addition, since they must be
 near an odd multiple of 
 in order for 
 to be large, the corresponding denominators must be odd. There is also a very strong
 correlation between 
 and the value of the subsequent term in the continued fraction expansion (i.e., a
 high value there implies the prior convergent was a good approximation to 
).
| smallest | convergent | largest | 
| 1 | 1.55741 | |
| 2 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 15 | 2.659341 | |
| 17 | 3.582052 | |
| 19 | 4.331096 | |
| 29 | 18.007800 | |
| 118 | ||
| 136 | ||
| 233 | 18.056613 | |
| 315 | 556.306227 | |
| 1134 | ||
| 1568 | ||
| 1718 | ||
| 2154 | ||
| 2468 | ||
| 3230 | ||
| 3727 | 2750.202396 | |
| 3763 | 10539.847388 | |
| 5187 | ||
| 8872 | ||
| 9768 | ||
| 11282 | ||
| 12284 | ||
| 15503 | 24263.751532 | |
| 24604 | ||
| 153396 | ||
| 156559 | 228085.415076 | 
The sequences of maxima and minima are almost certainly unbounded, but it is not known how to prove this fact.
 
         
	    
	
    

