The plastic constant, sometimes also called le nombre radiant, the minimal Pisot number, plastic number, plastic ratio, platin number, Siegel's number, or silver
number, is the limiting ratio of the successive terms of the Padovan
sequence or Perrin sequence. It is denoted
using
or
and given by
|
(1)
| |||
|
(2)
| |||
|
(3)
|
(OEIS A060006), where denotes a polynomial
root. It is therefore an algebraic number
of degree 3.
The plastic constant is the self-summing ratio.
It is also a special Pisot number (Smyth 1999,
p. 1).
It is also given by
|
(4)
|
where
|
(5)
|
where
is the j-function and the half-period
ratio is equal to
.
The plastic constant
was originally studied in 1924 by Gérard Cordonnier when he was 17. In his
later correspondence with Dom Hans van der Laan, he described applications to architecture,
using the name "radiant number." In 1958, Cordonnier gave a lecture tour
that illustrated the use of the constant in many existing buildings and monuments
(C. Mannu, pers. comm., Mar. 11, 2006).
satisfies the algebraic identities
|
(6)
|
and
|
(7)
|
and is therefore a morphic number, a real number
for which there exist positive integers
and
such that
and
. It was proven by Aarts
et al. (2001, p. 58) that
and the golden ratio
are in fact the only such numbers.
The identity
leads to the beautiful nested radical identity
|
(8)
|
The unit circle and the semicubical
parabola
intersect at
|
(9)
|
Indeed,
gives
(M. Schofield, pers. comm., Sep. 1, 2022).
The plastic constant is also connected with the ring of integers
of the number field
through a special value of the Weber
modular function
. This number
field has discriminant
and class number 3. Setting
gives
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
| |||
|
(13)
|
(OEIS A116397), where is the Dedekind
eta function.
The plastic constant is also the smallest Pisot number.
The plastic constant satisfies the near-identity
|
(14)
|
where the difference is .
Surprisingly, the plastic constant is connected to the metric properties of the snub icosidodecadodecahedron. It is also involved in the definition of maverick graphs.
A single Beloch fold gives a geometric construction of the plastic constant (Pegg 2025).
The plastic constant satisfies , where
is the golden
ratio, so has a reciprocal proportion
triangle.
A substitution tiling of quadrilaterals can be obtained using quadrilaterals having sides
in the ratio
and vertices in the complex plane given by powers
of the complex root
of
, as noticed by Pegg (2019).
The first twelve iterations of this substitution are illustrated above (E. Pegg, Jr., pers. comm., Mar. 21, 2025).
The limiting self-similar fractal is illustrated above, with its two first-level images colored separately. It is the
attractor of the two similarity
transformations underlying the quadrilateral substitution. These maps
have scale factors and
, obtained from the absolute values of the two complex multipliers. The
Hokkaido fractal is another construction involving
the nonreal roots of the same cubic
equation.
A further construction uses a pentagon with vertices in the complex plane given by ,
,
,
, and
, where
is the root with positive
imaginary part (Pegg 2026b). In this boundary order,
its side lengths are proportional
to
,
,
,
, and
. The corresponding interior
angles
,
,
,
, and
satisfy
,
, and
(Pegg 2026b). Starting with this pentagon,
a fractal is obtained by iterating the two similarity
transformations
|
(15)
| |||
|
(16)
|
The substitution system ,
,
, with dominant eigenvalue
, gives a Rauzy fractal
with three subtiles (Coulbois and Minervino 2017, pp. 6 and 12-13). In complex
eigenvector coordinates, the limiting attractor
of the pentagonal construction is similar to one of these
subtiles. The figure shows the seed at left and a finite approximation to the limiting
attractor at right, with its two first-level images
colored separately. The scale factors are
and
, whose squares sum to 1. The children extend
outside the seed pentagon, so the construction is not
a dissection of that pentagon.
After three steps of replacing all largest pieces, the polygonal patch contains a
triangular gap with side lengths
in the ratio
. These patches
establish neither a tiling of the plane
by these pentagons nor a nonperiodic
tiling by them. The limiting fractal admits a tiling of the plane using three
sizes of similar copies, with relative linear sizes
,
, and
. A proof uses the
algebraic conjugate obtained by replacing
with
. The inverse maps then partition
the interval
at
. Together with the field
norm, this gives uniform separation of the normalized translations
in compositions of a fixed total exponent
and implies positive area of the attractor.
With similarity dimension 2, positive area implies nonempty interior
(Schief 1994; Ye 2002, p. 44). Expanding a smaller copy lying wholly in the
interior and subdividing at comparable scales produces
the three-size tiling.
The numbers of copies in the pentagonal construction follow the Padovan sequence (Pegg 2026c). Replacing every largest copy produces children with linear
scale factors and
relative to their parent. For size levels with linear
sizes
,
, and
and counts
, advancing the size
threshold changes the counts to
. A level may
have zero copies, so advancing the threshold need not perform an actual replacement.
Writing
and
, the total after
replacements of all largest copies is
. The figure shows stages with 4, 12, and 37 copies,
colored by size. At stage 23, the largest, middle, and smallest copies number
,
, and
, respectively, totaling
. These are counts of substitution copies,
including their polygonal approximations, and do not remove the triangular
gaps described above.
The plastic constant also defines a tent tile using the maps and
, with
as above. For this attractor,
Scheicher et al. (2026) leave the existence of a point
lattice tiling by translates,
with or without half-turned copies, unresolved. This is a different question from
the three-size tiling of the pentagonal construction's
limiting fractal.
Hinsley (2016) illustrates a two-piece tile under the name Ammonite tile. The illustration above shows a finite approximation of this tile, up to
a similarity transformation, with its
two first-level pieces colored separately. With as above, it is the attractor
of the two similarity transformations
|
(17)
| |||
|
(18)
|
Its scale factors are and
. The similarity
transformation
carries this attractor to the bean-shaped attractor
of Pegg's pentagonal construction above. Hinsley's printed map list instead gives
in place of
, which does not reproduce his pictured tile.
There is also a configuration of 19 points in three-dimensional Euclidean space whose 171 pairwise distances are all integer
powers of
(Pegg 2026a). The illustration joins every pair of points, giving a geometric realization
of the complete graph
. Set
and
, and define
|
(19)
|
With integer indices, the point set is
|
(20)
|
The squares of its distances are for integers
between
and 6. This distance property does not establish a closed
substitution system.