Twin Prime Conjecture
There are two related conjectures, each called the twin prime conjecture. The first version states that there are an infinite number of pairs of twin primes (Guy 1994, p. 19). It is not known if there are an infinite number of such primes (Wells 1986, p. 41; Shanks 1993, p. 30), but it seems almost certain to be true. While Hardy and Wright (1979, p. 5) note that "the evidence, when examined in detail, appears to justify the conjecture," and Shanks (1993, p. 219) states even more strongly, "the evidence is overwhelming," Hardy and Wright also note that the proof or disproof of conjectures of this type "is at present beyond the resources of mathematics."
Arenstorf (2004) published a purported proof of the conjecture (Weisstein 2004). Unfortunately, a serious error was found in the proof. As a result, the paper was retracted and the twin prime conjecture remains fully open.
The conjecture that there are infinitely many Sophie Germain primes, i.e., primes
such that
is also prime, is very closely related (Shanks
1993, p. 30).
A second twin prime conjecture states that adding a correction proportional to
to a computation of Brun's
constant ending with
will give an estimate with error less than
.
An extended form of this conjecture, sometimes called the strong twin prime conjecture
(Shanks 1993, p. 30) or first Hardy-Littlewood
conjecture, states that the number
of twin
primes
less than or equal to
is asymptotically
equal to
where
is the so-called twin
primes constant (Hardy and Littlewood 1923). The value of
is plotted above for
, with
indicated in blue and taking
.
This conjecture is a special case of the more general k-tuple conjecture (also known as the first Hardy-Littlewood
conjecture), which corresponds to the set
.
twin prime conjecture