TOPICS
Search

Impossible Figure


A class of illusion in which an object which is physically unrealizable is apparently depicted.

More than 100 papers have been written about impossible figures (Kulpa 1987), and Escher made extensive use of them in some of his well-known drawings.

Dodik et al. (2025) introduced the mescher representation, in which an oriented triangle mesh has screen-space vertex coordinates and a signed relative-depth value zeta on each oriented edge. In the language of discrete exterior calculus, local consistency requires the oriented depth changes to sum to zero around every face, so zeta is a discrete closed form. Its discrete Hodge decomposition is

 zeta=d_0z+omega,

where z assigns an absolute depth to each vertex and omega is harmonic. The mesh can be globally embedded with those local depth cues iff omega=0; a nonzero omega is therefore a cohomological obstruction to global embeddability. This develops a connection between impossible figures and cohomology studied earlier by Penrose (1992).


See also

Ambihelical Hexnut, Freemish Crate, Home Plate, Illusion, Impossible Fork, Impossible Joinery, Impossible Torus, Klein Bottle, Necker Cube, Penrose Stairway, Penrose Triangle, Tribox

Explore with Wolfram|Alpha

References

Cerf, C. "A Family of Impossible Figures Studied by Knot Theory." https://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/vismath/cerf/.Cowan, T. M. "The Theory of Braids and the Analysis of Impossible Figures." J. Math. Psych. 11, 190-212, 1974.Cowan, T. M. "Supplementary Report: Braids, Side Segments, and Impossible Figures." J. Math. Psych. 16, 254-260, 1977.Cowan, T. M. "Organizing the Properties of Impossible Figures." Perception 6, 41-56, 1977.Cowan, T. M. "Turning the Penrose Triangle Inside Out." J. Math. Psych. 26, 252-262, 1982.Cowan, T. M. and Pringle, R. "An Investigation of the Cues Responsible for Figure Impossibility." J. Exper. Psych. Human Perception Performance 4, 112-120, 1978.Dodik, A.; Yu, I.; Chandra, K.; Ragan-Kelley, J.; Tenenbaum, J.; Sitzmann, V.; and Solomon, J. "Meschers: Geometry Processing of Impossible Objects." ACM Trans. Graphics 44, 70:1-70:10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3731422.Ernst, B. Adventures with Impossible Figures. Stradbroke, England: Tarquin, 1987.Fineman, M. The Nature of Visual Illusion. New York: Dover, pp. 119-122, 1996.Harris, W. F. "Perceptual Singularities in Impossible Pictures Represent Screw Dislocations." South African J. Sci. 69, 10-13, 1973.Jablan, S. "Impossible Figures." https://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/vismath/jablan/impos.htm.Knuth, D. E. §7.2.2.3 in The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 4. Pre-Fascicle 7A, p. 14, Dec. 5, 2024.Kulpa, Z. "Are Impossible Figures Possible?" Signal Processing 5, 201-220, 1983.Kulpa, Z. "Putting Order in the Impossible." Perception 16, 201-214, 1987.Penrose, R. "On the Cohomology of Impossible Figures." Leonardo 25, 245-247, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/1575844.Rakov, D. "Impossible Objects." http://www.rakov.de/ARTE.HTM.Rausch, J. "Impossible Objects." http://www.johnrausch.com/PuzzleWorld/cat/io000.htm.Robinson, J. O. "Impossible Figures." In The Psychology of Visual Illusion. New York: Dover, p. 176, 1998.Sugihara, K. "Classification of Impossible Objects." Perception 11, 65-74, 1982.Terouanne, E. "Impossible Figures and Interpretations of Polyhedral Figures." J. Math. Psych. 27, 370-405, 1983.Terouanne, E. "On a Class of 'Impossible' Figures: A New Language for a New Analysis." J. Math. Psych. 22, 24-47, 1983.Thro, E. B. "Distinguishing Two Classes of Impossible Objects." Perception 12, 733-751, 1983.Wilson, R. "Stamp Corner: Impossible Figures." Math. Intell. 13, 80, 1991.

Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha

Impossible Figure

Cite this as:

Weisstein, Eric W. "Impossible Figure." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImpossibleFigure.html

Subject classifications