The spherical harmonics can be generalized to vector spherical harmonics by looking for a scalar
function
and a constant vector
such that
(1)
| |||
(2)
| |||
(3)
| |||
(4)
|
so
(5)
|
Now interchange the order of differentiation and use the fact that multiplicative constants can be moving inside and outside the derivatives to obtain
(6)
| |||
(7)
| |||
(8)
|
and
(9)
| |||
(10)
|
Putting these together gives
(11)
|
so
satisfies the vector Helmholtz differential
equation if
satisfies the scalar Helmholtz
differential equation
(12)
|
Construct another vector function
(13)
|
which also satisfies the vector Helmholtz differential equation since
(14)
| |||
(15)
| |||
(16)
| |||
(17)
| |||
(18)
|
which gives
(19)
|
We have the additional identity
(20)
| |||
(21)
| |||
(22)
| |||
(23)
| |||
(24)
|
In this formalism, is called the generating function and
is called the pilot vector.
The choice of generating function is determined by the symmetry of the scalar equation,
i.e., it is chosen to solve the desired scalar differential equation. If
is taken as
(25)
|
where
is the radius vector, then
is a solution to the vector wave equation in spherical coordinates.
If we want vector solutions which are tangential to the radius vector,
(26)
| |||
(27)
| |||
(28)
|
so
(29)
|
and we may take
(30)
|
(Arfken 1985, pp. 707-711; Bohren and Huffman 1983, p. 88).
A number of conventions are in use. Hill (1954) defines
(31)
| |||
(32)
| |||
(33)
|
Morse and Feshbach (1953) define vector harmonics called ,
, and
using rather complicated expressions.