If
denotes the usual dilogarithm, then there are two
variants that are normalized slightly differently, both called the Rogers
-function (Rogers 1907). Bytsko (1999) defines
|
(1)
| |||
|
(2)
|
(which he calls "the" dilogarithm), while Gordon and McIntosh (1997) and Loxton (1991, p. 287) define the Rogers -function as
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
|
The function
satisfies the concise reflection relation
|
(6)
|
(Euler 1768), as well as Abel's functional equation
|
(7)
|
(Abel 1988, Bytsko 1999). Abel's duplication formula for
follows from Abel's functional equation
and is given by
|
(8)
|
The function has the nice series
|
(9)
|
(Lewin 1982; Loxton 1991, p. 298).
In terms of ,
the well-known dilogarithm identities become
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
| |||
|
(13)
| |||
|
(14)
|
(Loxton 1991, pp. 287 and 289; Bytsko 1999), where .
Khoi (2014) gave the identity
|
(15)
|
where
is the golden ratio (Khoi 2014, Campbell 2021).
Numbers
which satisfy
|
(16)
|
for some value of
are called L-algebraic numbers. Loxton (1991,
p. 289) gives a slew of identities having rational coefficients
|
(17)
|
instead of integers, where is a rational number, a
corrected and expanded version of which is summarized in the following table. In
this table, polynomials
denote the real root of
. Many more similar identities can be found using integer
relation algorithms.
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
Bytsko (1999) gives the additional identities
|
(18)
| |
|
(19)
| |
|
(20)
| |
|
(21)
| |
|
(22)
| |
|
(23)
| |
|
(24)
| |
|
(25)
| |
|
(26)
|
where
|
(27)
| |||
|
(28)
| |||
|
(29)
|
with
the positive root of
|
(30)
|
and
and
the real roots of
|
(31)
|
Here, (◇) and (◇) are special cases of Watson's identities and (◇) is a special case of Abel's
duplication formula with (Gordon and McIntosh 1997, Bytsko 1999).
Rogers (1907) obtained a dilogarithm identity in variables with
terms which simplifies to Euler's identity for
and Abel's functional
equation for
(Gordon and McIntosh 1997). For
, it is equivalent to
|
(32)
|
with
|
(33)
| |||
|
(34)
|
(Gordon and McIntosh 1997).