If 
 denotes the usual dilogarithm, then there are two
 variants that are normalized slightly differently, both called the Rogers 
-function (Rogers 1907). Bytsko (1999) defines
| 
(1)
 | |||
| 
(2)
 | 
(which he calls "the" dilogarithm), while Gordon and McIntosh (1997) and Loxton (1991, p. 287) define the Rogers -function as
| 
(3)
 | |||
| 
(4)
 | |||
| 
(5)
 | 
The function 
 satisfies the concise reflection relation
| 
(6)
 | 
(Euler 1768), as well as Abel's functional equation
| 
(7)
 | 
(Abel 1988, Bytsko 1999). Abel's duplication formula for 
 follows from Abel's functional equation
 and is given by
| 
(8)
 | 
The function has the nice series
| 
(9)
 | 
(Lewin 1982; Loxton 1991, p. 298).
In terms of ,
 the well-known dilogarithm identities become
| 
(10)
 | |||
| 
(11)
 | |||
| 
(12)
 | |||
| 
(13)
 | |||
| 
(14)
 | 
(Loxton 1991, pp. 287 and 289; Bytsko 1999), where .
Khoi (2014) gave the identity
| 
(15)
 | 
where 
 is the golden ratio (Khoi 2014, Campbell 2021).
Numbers 
 which satisfy
| 
(16)
 | 
for some value of 
 are called L-algebraic numbers. Loxton (1991,
 p. 289) gives a slew of identities having rational coefficients
| 
(17)
 | 
instead of integers, where  is a rational number, a
 corrected and expanded version of which is summarized in the following table. In
 this table, polynomials 
 denote the real root of 
. Many more similar identities can be found using integer
 relation algorithms.
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
Bytsko (1999) gives the additional identities
| 
(18)
 | |
| 
(19)
 | |
| 
(20)
 | |
| 
(21)
 | |
| 
(22)
 | |
| 
(23)
 | |
| 
(24)
 | |
| 
(25)
 | |
| 
(26)
 | 
where
| 
(27)
 | |||
| 
(28)
 | |||
| 
(29)
 | 
with 
 the positive root of
| 
(30)
 | 
and 
 and 
 the real roots of
| 
(31)
 | 
Here, (◇) and (◇) are special cases of Watson's identities and (◇) is a special case of Abel's
 duplication formula with  (Gordon and McIntosh 1997, Bytsko 1999).
Rogers (1907) obtained a dilogarithm identity in  variables with 
 terms which simplifies to Euler's identity for 
 and Abel's functional
 equation for 
 (Gordon and McIntosh 1997). For 
, it is equivalent to
| 
(32)
 | 
with
| 
(33)
 | |||
| 
(34)
 | 
(Gordon and McIntosh 1997).
 
         
	    
	
    

