The -state Potts model on a finite
graph
assigns to each graph vertex
a state
. For a positive
integer
and real interaction parameter
, set
. The zero-field partition
function can then be written
|
(1)
|
where is the Kronecker
delta. Equal states on adjacent graph vertices
are favored when
and disfavored when
.
Potts (1952) introduced the model as a
-state generalization of the Ising
model, which is recovered at
up to a constant normalization
and a rescaling of
.
Expanding the product and then summing over the states gives the Fortuin-Kasteleyn or random-cluster model representation
|
(2)
|
where
is the number of connected components of the
spanning subgraph
(Fortuin and Kasteleyn 1972). Indeed, after the graph
edges in
have imposed equality of incident states, each connected
component may be assigned any one of the
states. The right side is a polynomial
in
and
, so it extends the partition
function from positive integers
to arbitrary complex numbers
and
.
For the homogeneous random-cluster model in which every graph edge has parameter , the corresponding normalizing sum is
|
(3)
|
Thus gives independent bond percolation, while other positive
values of
weight a configuration of graph edges according to
its number of connected components.
Setting
and
, the same expansion identifies the
Potts partition function
with an evaluation of the Tutte polynomial:
|
(4)
|
At , adjacent graph
vertices must have different states, and hence
|
(5)
|
where
is the chromatic polynomial. Consequently,
the Potts model simultaneously provides state-sum, random-cluster, and graph-polynomial interpretations of the same invariant
of a finite graph (Wu 1982).
Averous et al. (2026) reported conformal invariance of the critical four-state Potts model on the square integer lattice . The proof
uses convergence of the associated random-cluster
model loops to the conformal loop ensemble
in the scaling limit.
For a tree broadcast model, the root spin is uniform among states, and each child is transmitted
independently conditional on its parent through
, where
and
. Reconstruction means that observations
of increasingly distant levels retain nonzero information
about the root.