In his last letter to Hardy, Ramanujan defined 17 Jacobi theta function-like functions with
which he called "mock theta functions" (Watson
1936ab, Ramanujan 1988, pp. 127-131; Ramanujan 2000, pp. 354-355). These
functions are q-series with exponential singularities
such that the arguments terminate for some power
. In particular, if
is not a Jacobi
theta function, then it is a mock theta function if, for each root
of unity
,
there is an approximation of the form
(1)
|
as
with
(Gordon and McIntosh 2000).
If, in addition, for every root of unity there are modular forms
and real numbers
and
such that
(2)
|
is bounded as
radially approaches
,
then
is said to be a strong mock theta function (Gordon and McIntosh 2000).
Ramanujan found an additional three mock theta functions in his "lost notebook" which were subsequently rediscovered by Watson (1936ab). The first formula on page
15 of Ramanujan's lost notebook relates the functions which Watson calls and
(equivalent to the third equation on page 63 of Watson's
1936 paper), and the last formula on page 31 of the lost notebook relates what Watson
calls
and
(equivalent to the fourth equation on page 63 of Watson's paper). The orders of these
and Ramanujan's original 17 functions were all 3, 5, or 7.
Ramanujan's "lost notebook" also contained several mock theta functions of orders 6 and 10, which, however, were not explicitly identified as mock theta functions by Ramanujan. Their properties have now been investigated in detail (Andrews and Hickerson 1991, Choi 1999).
Unfortunately, while known identities make it clear that mock theta functions of "order"
are related to the number
, no formal definition for the order of a mock theta function
is known. As a result, the term "order" must be regarded merely as a convenient
label when applied to mock theta functions (Andrews and Hickerson 1991).
The complete list of mock theta functions of order 3 are
(3)
| |||
(4)
| |||
(5)
| |||
(6)
| |||
(7)
| |||
(8)
| |||
(9)
|
with ,
,
and
due to Watson (1936ab; Dragonette 1952). Note that the series for
does not converge, but the series of even and odd partial
sums do converge, so
is commonly taken as the average of these two values (Andrews
and Hickerson 1991).
The following table summarizes the first few terms of these series. in particular is considered by Dragonette (1952), who showed
that the coefficients
of the series for
satisfy
(10)
|
where
is a partition function P and
is the sequence 1, 0,
, 4,
, 4,
, 8,
, 8,
, ... (OEIS A064053)
for
,
1, ....
function | OEIS | series |
A000025 | 1, 1, | |
A053250 | 1, 1, 0, | |
A053251 | 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, ... | |
A053252 | 1,
1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, | |
A053253 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 22, 29, ... | |
A053254 | 1,
| |
A053255 | 1, |
Watson (1936ab) proved the fundamental relations connecting Ramanujan's mock theta functions,
(11)
| |
(12)
| |
(13)
| |
(14)
|
where
is a Jacobi theta function (Dragonette 1952).
Ramanujan (2000, pp. 354-355) gave 10 mock theta functions of order five, given by
(15)
| |||
(16)
| |||
(17)
| |||
(18)
| |||
(19)
| |||
(20)
| |||
(21)
| |||
(22)
| |||
(23)
| |||
(24)
|
(Andrews 1986). Note that the notation here follows the standard convention .
Ramanujan gave seven mock theta functions of order six, given by
(25)
| |||
(26)
| |||
(27)
| |||
(28)
| |||
(29)
| |||
(30)
| |||
(31)
|
(Andrews and Hickerson 1991).
Ramanujan (2000, p. 355) also gave three mock theta functions of order seven, given by
(32)
| |||
(33)
| |||
(34)
|
(Andrews 1986).
Gordon and McIntosh (2000) found eight mock theta functions of order 8,
(35)
| |||
(36)
| |||
(37)
| |||
(38)
| |||
(39)
| |||
(40)
| |||
(41)
| |||
(42)
| |||
(43)
| |||
(44)
|