TOPICS
Search

Algebraic Period


An algebraic period is a complex number whose real part and imaginary part can each be expressed as an absolutely convergent integral

 r=int_DQ(x_1,...,x_n)dx_1...dx_n,

where Q is a rational function with rational coefficients and D subset= R^n is a finite union of domains defined by finitely many inequalities between polynomials with rational coefficients (Kontsevich and Zagier 2001).

Periods (which are countable) were defined to fill in a gap between algebraic numbers (which do not contain many mathematical constants) and the transcendental numbers (which are not countable). In particular, any algebraic number is a period and any number that is not a period is a transcendental number (Waldschmidt 2006), so there is a "gap" between those two statements in the sense that algebraic periods may be algebraic or transcendental. As a result, Kontsevich and Zagier (2001) propose their Principle 1: "Whenever you meet a new number, and have decided (or convinced yourself) that it is transcendental, try to figure out whether it is a period."

Periods form a ring since sums and products of periods are also periods. However, this class of numbers is larger and less well understood than the ring of algebraic numbers. Periods have explicit integral descriptions, but need not be constructible numbers in the straightedge-and-compass sense. It is conjectured that equality of any two numbers which have been expressed as periods can be verified. Most of the important constants of mathematics belong to the class of periods (Kontsevich and Zagier 2001).

Examples of periods include

 pi=int_0^1(4dx)/(x^2+1),

zeta(n) for integers n>=2, where zeta(s) is the Riemann zeta function, and [Gamma(p/q)]^q for positive integers p and q, where Gamma is the gamma function (Kontsevich and Zagier 2001).

Chaitin's constant Omega is not a period because it is a noncomputable number, whereas every real period is a computable number (Yoshinaga 2008). In particular, a period can be approximated by an algorithm to any prescribed positive rational number error tolerance. The noncomputability of Omega rules out such an algorithm.

It is not known if e, 1/pi, or the Euler-Mascheroni constant gamma are periods, though it is conjectured that e and gamma are not.


See also

Algebraic Number, Chaitin's Constant, Computable Number, Transcendental Number

Explore with Wolfram|Alpha

References

Belkale, P. and Brosnan, P. "Periods and Igusa Local Zeta Functions." Int. Math. Res. Not. 49, 2655-2670, 2003.Kontsevich, M. and Zagier, D. "Periods." In Mathematics Unlimited-2001 and Beyond (Ed. B. Engquist and W. Schmid). Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 771-808, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56478-9_39.Marcolli, M. "Feynman Integrals and Motives." Europ. Congress Math. Eur. Math. Soc. Zürich, pp. 293-332, 2010.Waldschmidt, M. "Transcendence of Periods: The State of the Art." Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 2, 435-463, 2006.Yoshinaga, M. "Periods and Elementary Real Numbers." 03 May 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0349.

Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha

Algebraic Period

Cite this as:

Weisstein, Eric W. "Algebraic Period." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/AlgebraicPeriod.html

Subject classifications