|
An elliptic integral is an integral of the form
 |
(1)
|
or
 |
(2)
|
where , , , and are polynomials in , and is a polynomial of degree 3 or 4. Stated more simply, an elliptic
integral is an integral of the form
 |
(3)
|
where is a rational function of and , is a function
of that is cubic or quartic
in , contains
at least one odd power of , and has no repeated
factors (Abramowitz and Stegun 1972, p. 589).
Elliptic integrals can be viewed as generalizations of the inverse trigonometric functions and provide solutions to a wider class
of problems. For instance, while the arc
length of a circle is given as a
simple function of the parameter, computing the arc
length of an ellipse requires an
elliptic integral. Similarly, the position of a pendulum is given by a trigonometric function as a function of time for small angle
oscillations, but the full solution for arbitrarily large displacements requires
the use of elliptic integrals. Many other problems in electromagnetism and gravitation
are solved by elliptic integrals.
A very useful class of functions known as elliptic functions is obtained by inverting elliptic integrals to obtain generalizations
of the trigonometric functions. Elliptic
functions (among which the Jacobi
elliptic functions and Weierstrass
elliptic function are the two most common forms) provide a powerful tool for
analyzing many deep problems in number
theory, as well as other areas of mathematics.
All elliptic integrals can be written in terms of three "standard" types. To see this, write
But since ,
then
so
But any function can be evaluated in terms
of elementary functions,
so the only portion that need be considered is
 |
(13)
|
Now, any quartic can be expressed as where
The coefficients here are real, since pairs of complex roots are complex
conjugates
If all four roots are real, they must be arranged so as not to interleave (Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 514). Now
define a quantity such that
 |
(18)
|
is a square number and
 |
(19)
|
 |
(20)
|
Call the roots of this equation and , then
Taking (25) (26) and
gives
Solving gives
so we have
![w^2=S_1S_2=[A_1(x-alpha)^2+B_1(x-beta)^2][A^2(x-alpha)^2+B^2(x-beta)^2].](/images/equations/EllipticIntegral/NumberedEquation8.gif) |
(34)
|
Now let
so
and
Now let
 |
(45)
|
so
 |
(46)
|
Rewriting the even and odd parts
gives
so we have
 |
(51)
|
Letting
reduces the second integral to
 |
(54)
|
which can be evaluated using elementary functions. The first integral can then be reduced by integration by parts to one of the three Legendre elliptic
integrals (also called Legendre-Jacobi elliptic integrals), known as incomplete elliptic integrals
of the first, second,
and third kinds,
denoted , , and , respectively (von Kármán
and Biot 1940, Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 515). If , then the
integrals are called complete elliptic integrals and are denoted , , .
Incomplete elliptic integrals are denoted using a elliptic modulus , parameter , or modular angle .
An elliptic integral is written when the
parameter is used, when the
elliptic modulus is used, and
when the modular angle is used. Complete elliptic integrals are defined
when and can be expressed using the
expansion
 |
(55)
|
An elliptic integral in standard form
 |
(56)
|
where
 |
(57)
|
can be computed analytically (Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 453) in terms of the Weierstrass elliptic
function with invariants
If is a root of , then the
solution is
![x=x_0+1/4f^'(x_0)[P(z;g_2,g_3)-1/(24)f^('')(x_0)]^(-1).](/images/equations/EllipticIntegral/NumberedEquation16.gif) |
(60)
|
For an arbitrary lower bound,
![x=a+(sqrt(f(a))P^'(z)+1/2f^'(a)[P(z)-1/(24)f^('')(a)]+1/(24)f(a)f^(''')(a))/(2[P(z)-1/(24)f^('')(a)]^2-1/(48)f(a)f^((iv))(a)),](/images/equations/EllipticIntegral/NumberedEquation17.gif) |
(61)
|
where is a Weierstrass elliptic function (Whittaker and Watson 1990, p. 454).
A generalized elliptic integral can be defined by the function
(Borwein and Borwein 1987). Now let
But
 |
(66)
|
so
and
 |
(71)
|
and the equation becomes
Now we make the further substitution . The
differential becomes
 |
(74)
|
but , so
 |
(75)
|
 |
(76)
|
and
 |
(77)
|
However, the left side is always positive, so
 |
(78)
|
and the differential is
 |
(79)
|
We need to take some care with the limits of integration. Write (◇) as
 |
(80)
|
Now change the limits to those appropriate for the integration
 |
(81)
|
so we have picked up a factor of 2 which must be included. Using this fact and plugging (◇) in (◇) therefore gives
 |
(82)
|
Now note that
Plug (◇) into (◇) to obtain
But
so
 |
(93)
|
and (◇) becomes
We have therefore demonstrated that
 |
(96)
|
We can thus iterate
as many times as we wish, without changing the value of the integral. But this iteration is the same as and therefore converges to the arithmetic-geometric mean, so the iteration terminates at , and we have
Complete elliptic integrals arise in finding the arc length of an ellipse and the period of a pendulum. They also arise in a
natural way from the theory of theta functions. Complete elliptic integrals can be
computed using a procedure involving the arithmetic-geometric mean. Note that
So we have
 |
(108)
|
where is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind. We are free to
let and , so
 |
(109)
|
since , so
 |
(110)
|
But the arithmetic-geometric
mean is defined by
where
 |
(114)
|
so we have
 |
(115)
|
where is the value to which converges. Similarly,
taking instead and gives
 |
(116)
|
Borwein and Borwein (1987) also show that defining
leads to
 |
(119)
|
so
 |
(120)
|
for and , and
 |
(121)
|
The elliptic integrals satisfy a large number of identities. The complementary functions and moduli are defined by
 |
(122)
|
Use the identity of generalized elliptic integrals
 |
(123)
|
to write
 |
(129)
|
Define
 |
(130)
|
and use
 |
(131)
|
so
 |
(132)
|
Now letting gives
 |
(133)
|
 |
(134)
|
and
Writing instead of ,
 |
(142)
|
Similarly, from Borwein and Borwein (1987),
 |
(143)
|
 |
(144)
|
Expressions in terms of the complementary function can be derived from interchanging the moduli and their complements in (◇), (◇), (◇), and (◇).
and
 |
(151)
|
 |
(152)
|
Taking the ratios
 |
(153)
|
gives the modular equation
of degree 2. It is also true that
![K(x)=4/((1+sqrt(x^'))^2)K([(1-RadicalBox[{1, -, {x, ^, 4}}, 4])/(1+RadicalBox[{1, -, {x, ^, 4}}, 4])]^2).](/images/equations/EllipticIntegral/NumberedEquation54.gif) |
(154)
|
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). "Elliptic Integrals." Ch. 17 in Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical
Tables, 9th printing. New York: Dover, pp. 587-607, 1972.
Arfken, G. "Elliptic Integrals." §5.8 in Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press, pp. 321-327, 1985.
Borwein, J. M. and Borwein, P. B. Pi & the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational
Complexity. New York: Wiley, 1987.
Hancock, H. Elliptic Integrals. New York: Wiley, 1917.
Kármán, T. von and Biot, M. A. Mathematical Methods in Engineering: An Introduction to the Mathematical
Treatment of Engineering Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 121, 1940.
King, L. V. The Direct Numerical Calculation of Elliptic Functions and Integrals.
London: Cambridge University Press, 1924.
Prasolov, V. and Solovyev, Y. Elliptic Functions and Elliptic Integrals. Providence,
RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 1997.
Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; and Vetterling, W. T. "Elliptic Integrals and Jacobi Elliptic Functions." §6.11 in Numerical
Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 254-263, 1992.
Prudnikov, A. P.; Brychkov, Yu. A.; and Marichev, O. I. Integrals and Series, Vol. 1: Elementary Functions.
New York: Gordon & Breach, 1986.
Timofeev, A. F. Integration of Functions. Moscow and Leningrad: GTTI,
1948.
Weisstein, E. W. "Books about Elliptic Integrals." http://www.ericweisstein.com/encyclopedias/books/EllipticIntegrals.html.
Whittaker, E. T. and Watson, G. N. A Course in Modern Analysis, 4th ed. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Woods, F. S. "Elliptic Integrals." Ch. 16 in Advanced Calculus: A Course Arranged with Special Reference to
the Needs of Students of Applied Mathematics. Boston, MA: Ginn, pp. 365-386,
1926.
|