Medvedev logic is the extension of propositional intuitionistic logic consisting of the formulas valid on every finite Kripke frame
where ,
denotes the power
set, and a world
is accessible from
exactly when
is a subset of
. Its interpretation as a logic of finite problems originates
with Medvedev (1962). For
, the worlds are
,
, and
, with the first world accessing both singleton worlds. Validity
requires truth at every world for every interpretation of the propositional variables
allowed by Kripke frame semantics.
Almeida and Knudstorp (2026) reported that the set of valid formulas is recursively
undecidable and is not a recursively
enumerable set. Their reduction relates invalidity to the existence of periodic
tilings by Wang tiles. Independently,
Pawłowski (2026) reported that the complement is a recursively
enumerable set with the following completeness property. After encoding formulas
by Gödel numbers, for any recursively
enumerable set
there is a computable function
defined on every natural number
such that
iff
encodes an invalid formula.
These results would answer the longstanding question of whether Medvedev logic admits
an effective enumeration of its theorems in the negative.
Almeida and Knudstorp (2026) disclose that GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 supplied central arguments and Lean formalization. The Lean development checks the central reduction. As of Sep. 18, 2026, an independent rebuild and specialist review of the complete argument had not been reported. Their paper also reports that the related Skvortsov logic is recursively undecidable and is a proper sublogic of Medvedev logic.