Goodstein Sequence
Given a hereditary representation of a number
in base
, let
be the nonnegative integer which results if we syntactically
replace each
by
(i.e.,
is a base change operator that 'bumps the base'
from
up to
). The hereditary
representation of 266 in base 2 is
|
(1)
| |||
|
(2)
|
so bumping the base from 2 to 3 yields
|
(3)
|
Now repeatedly bump the base and subtract 1,
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
| |||
|
(6)
| |||
|
(7)
| |||
|
(8)
| |||
|
(9)
| |||
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
|
etc.
Starting this procedure at an integer
gives the Goodstein
sequence
. Amazingly, despite the apparent
rapid increase in the terms of the sequence, Goodstein's
theorem states that
is 0 for
any
and any sufficiently large
. Even more amazingly,
Paris and Kirby showed in 1982 that Goodstein's theorem is not provable in ordinary
Peano arithmetic (Borwein and Bailey 2003, p. 35).
number bases

