TOPICS
Search

de Bruijn-Newman Constant


The de Bruijn-Newman constant Lambda is the real number such that the function H(lambda,z) defined below has only real zeros if and only if lambda>=Lambda. Let Xi be the xi-function defined by

 Xi(iz)=1/2(z^2-1/4)pi^(-z/2-1/4)Gamma(1/2z+1/4)zeta(z+1/2).
(1)

Xi(z/2)/8 can be viewed as the Fourier transform of the signal

 Phi(t)=sum_(n=1)^infty(2pi^2n^4e^(9t)-3pin^2e^(5t))e^(-pin^2e^(4t))
(2)

for t in R, t>=0. Then denote the Fourier transform of Phi(t)e^(lambdat^2) as H(lambda,z),

 F_t[Phi(t)e^(lambdat^2)](z)=H(lambda,z).
(3)

Newman (1976) proved that such a constant exists and conjectured that Lambda>=0. The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the conjecture that Lambda<=0, so Newman's conjecture asserts that the Riemann hypothesis, if true, is only barely true. The following table summarizes best known lower bounds on Lambda prior to 2020, when Rodgers and Tao (2020) proved that Lambda>=0.

lower boundreference
-inftyNewman (1976)
-50Csordas-Norfolk-Varga (1988)
-5te Riele (1991)
-0.385Norfolk-Ruttan-Varga (1992)
-0.0991Csordas-Ruttan-Varga (1991)
-4.379×10^(-6)Csordas-Smith-Varga (1994)
-5.895×10^(-9)Csordas-Odlyzko-Smith-Varga (1993)
-2.63×10^(-9)Odlyzko (2000)
-1.15×10^(-11)Saouter-Gourdon-Demichel (2011)

Upper bounds on Lambda are summarized below. The final three rows are computer-assisted bounds reported in 2026 that had not undergone external peer review as of Sep. 15, 2026.

upper boundreferencestatus
<=1/2de Bruijn (1950)published
<1/2Ki-Kim-Lee (2009)published
<=0.22Polymath (2019)published
<=0.2Platt-Trudgian (2021)published
<=0.1875Mosaic Intelligence (2026)unreviewed
<=893927/5000000=0.1787854Gomila (2026)unreviewed
<0.158Gordon (2026)unreviewed

Mosaic Intelligence (2026) describes its bound as AI-generated. Gomila (2026) reports human-directed work using Claude and ChatGPT/Codex, while Gordon (2026) reports assistance from GPT-6 Astra and Claude Code. The Mosaic Intelligence and Gomila projects provide numerical certificates. Gordon's partial Lean formalization is conditional on stated analytic inputs.


See also

de Bruijn Constant, Riemann Hypothesis, Xi-Function

Explore with Wolfram|Alpha

References

Csordas, G.; Norfolk, T. S.; and Varga, R. S. "A Lower Bound for the De Bruijn-Newman Constant Lambda." Numer. Math. 52, 483-497, 1988.Csordas, G.; Odlyzko, A.; Smith, W.; and Varga, R. S. "A New Lehmer Pair of Zeros and a New Lower Bound for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Elec. Trans. Numer. Analysis 1, 104-111, 1993.Csordas, G.; Ruttan, A.; and Varga, R. S. "The Laguerre Inequalities with Applications to a Problem Associated with the Riemann Hypothesis." Numer. Algorithms 1, 305-329, 1991.Csordas, G.; Smith, W.; and Varga, R. S. "Lehmer Pairs of Zeros, the de Bruijn-Newman Constant and the Riemann Hypothesis." Constr. Approx. 10, 107-129, 1994.de Bruijn, N. G. "The Roots of Trigonometric Integrals." Duke Math. J. 17, 197-226, 1950.Finch, S. R. "De Bruijn-Newman Constant." §2.3 2 in Mathematical Constants. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203-205, 2003.Gomila, J. "A Computer-Assisted Proof of the Bound Lambda<=893927/5000000=0.1787854 for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Aug. 20, 2026. https://github.com/judegomila/dbn-lambda-01787854-candidate-audit.Gordon, S. "A Computer-Assisted Upper Bound for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Sep. 12, 2026. https://github.com/stefangordon/dbn-upper-bound/releases/tag/v1.0.0.Ki, H.; Kim, Y.-O.; and Lee, J. "On the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Adv. Math. 222, 281-306, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2009.04.003.Mosaic Intelligence. "A Certified Unconditional Upper Bound Lambda<=0.1875 for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Jul. 3, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21175533.Newman, C. M. "Fourier Transforms with only Real Zeros." Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 61, 245-251, 1976.Norfolk, T. S.; Ruttan, A.; and Varga, R. S. "A Lower Bound for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant Lambda II." In Progress in Approximation Theory (Ed. A. A. Gonchar and E. B. Saff). New York: Springer, pp. 403-418, 1992.Odlyzko, A. M. "An Improved Bound for the De Bruijn-Newman Constant." Numer. Algorithms 25, 293-303, 2000.Platt, D. and Trudgian, T. "The Riemann Hypothesis Is True up to 3×10^(12)." Bull. London Math. Soc. 53, 792-797, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.12460.Polymath, D. H. J. "Effective Approximation of Heat Flow Evolution of the Riemann Xi Function, and a New Upper Bound for the de Bruijn-Newman Constant." Res. Math. Sci. 6, Article 31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-019-0193-1.Rodgers, B. and Tao, T. "The De Bruijn-Newman Constant Is Non-Negative." Forum Math., Pi 8, e6, 62 pp., 2020.Saouter, Y.; Gourdon, X.; and Demichel, P. "An Improved Lower Bound for the De Bruijn-Newman Constant." Math. Comp. 80, 2281-2287, 2011.te Riele, H. J. J. "A New Lower Bound for the De Bruijn-Newman Constant." Numer. Math. 58, 661-667, 1991.

Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha

de Bruijn-Newman Constant

Cite this as:

Weisstein, Eric W. "de Bruijn-Newman Constant." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/deBruijn-NewmanConstant.html

Subject classifications