Continuum Hypothesis
The proposal originally made by Georg Cantor that there is no infinite set with a cardinal number between that of the "small"
infinite set of integers
and the
"large" infinite set of real numbers
(the "continuum").
Symbolically, the continuum hypothesis is that
. Problem
1a of Hilbert's problems asks if the continuum
hypothesis is true.
Gödel showed that no contradiction would arise if the continuum hypothesis were added to conventional Zermelo-Fraenkel
set theory. However, using a technique called forcing,
Paul Cohen (1963, 1964) proved that no contradiction would arise if the negation
of the continuum hypothesis was added to set theory.
Together, Gödel's and Cohen's results established that the validity of the continuum
hypothesis depends on the version of set theory being
used, and is therefore undecidable (assuming the
Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms together with
the axiom of choice).
Conway and Guy (1996, p. 282) recount a generalized version of the continuum hypothesis originally due to Hausdorff in 1908 which is also undecidable:
is
for every
? The continuum hypothesis follows
from generalized continuum hypothesis, so
.
Woodin (2001ab, 2002) formulated a new plausible "axiom" whose adoption (in addition to the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms
and axiom of choice) would imply that the continuum
hypothesis is false. Since set theoreticians have felt for some time that the Continuum
Hypothesis should be false, if Woodin's axiom proves to be particularly elegant,
useful, or intuitive, it may catch on. It is interesting to compare this to a situation
with Euclid's parallel postulate more than
300 years ago, when Wallis proposed an additional axiom that would imply the parallel
postulate (Greenberg 1994, pp. 152-153).
SEE ALSO: Aleph-0,
Aleph-1,
Axiom of Choice,
Cardinal
Number,
Continuum,
Denumerable
Set,
Forcing,
Hilbert's
Problems,
Lebesgue Measurability
Problem,
Undecidable,
Zermelo-Fraenkel
Axioms,
Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
Portions of this entry contributed by Matthew
Szudzik
REFERENCES:
Cohen, P. J. "The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis." Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 50, 1143-1148, 1963.
Cohen, P. J. "The Independence of the Continuum Hypothesis. II." Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 51, 105-110, 1964.
Cohen, P. J. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: W. A. Benjamin,
1966.
Conway, J. H. and Guy, R. K. The
Book of Numbers. New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 282, 1996.
Ferreirós, J. "The Notion of Cardinality and the Continuum Hypothesis." Ch. 6 in Labyrinth
of Thought: A History of Set Theory and Its Role in Modern Mathematics. Basel,
Switzerland: Birkhäuser, pp. 171-214, 1999.
Gödel, K. The Consistency of the Continuum-Hypothesis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 1940.
Greenberg, M. J. Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and History, 3rd ed. San Francisco,
CA: W. H. Freeman, 1994.
Hoffman, P. The Man Who Loved Only Numbers: The Story of Paul Erdős and the Search for Mathematical
Truth. New York: Hyperion, pp. 225-226, 1998.
Jech, T. J. Set
Theory, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
McGough, N. "The Continuum Hypothesis." http://www.ii.com/math/ch/.
Woodin, H "The Continuum Hypothesis. Part I." Not. Amer. Math. Soc. 48,
567-576, 2001a.
Woodin, H "The Continuum Hypothesis. Part II." Not. Amer. Math. Soc. 48,
681-690, 2001b.
Woodin, H "Correction to: The Continuum Hypothesis. Part II." Not. Amer.
Math. Soc. 49, 46, 2002.
CITE THIS AS:
Szudzik, Matthew and Weisstein, Eric W. "Continuum Hypothesis." From MathWorld--A
Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ContinuumHypothesis.html